See Beyond the Courtroom: Social Media Review
PeerProbe's Social Media Review taps into publicly available social activity to reveal jurors' biases and affiliations — ethically and legally.
Hidden Attitudes Hide Online
- 1
Social media posts and group memberships often reveal attitudes and experiences that jurors may not disclose in court.
- 2
Manual social media checks are time‑consuming and risk crossing ethical boundaries.
- 3
Attorneys must follow strict rules: viewing public posts is permitted, but sending friend requests, direct messages or using third parties to contact jurors is prohibited.
Ethical Compliance
Ethical Social Media Analytics
Our Social Media Review engine automatically scans prospective jurors' public profiles to identify anti‑corporate sentiment, group affiliations and behavioural patterns.
We adhere to ethical standards: we only view public information and never contact jurors, avoiding prohibited actions like friend requests or messages.
The system transforms these insights into bias scores, allowing you to craft targeted voir dire questions and make informed strikes.
Why it matters for your firm
Reveal Hidden Attitudes
Identify clusters of anti‑corporate sentiment and past experiences that could influence juror decisions.
Ethical & Compliant
Only public information is accessed; we respect privacy settings and avoid any ex‑parte communication.
Save Time
AI automates the collection and analysis of social media data, freeing your team from tedious manual research.
Actionable Insights
Turn social media data into focused voir dire questions and improve juror selection.
How Social Media Review Works
Gather Public Profiles
Our system locates prospective jurors' public social‑media accounts and compiles posts, group memberships and comment history.
Analyse Content
AI and NLP evaluate posts, affiliations and reaction patterns to detect bias indicators and categorize sentiments.
Generate Reports
The platform summarises these findings into bias scores and narrative insights, highlighting which jurors warrant further questioning.
Real attorneys, real outcomes
Before PeerProbe
"We manually searched juror names across social platforms and often missed key details."
After PeerProbe
"PeerProbe's Social Media Review uncovered clusters of anti‑corporate sentiment and previous negative experiences, enabling us to tailor our voir dire questions and secure a balanced panel."
— Litigation Consultant
Before PeerProbe
"We worried about crossing ethical lines during social‑media checks."
After PeerProbe
"PeerProbe automated the process and ensured we only accessed public information, giving us confidence that we remained compliant with professional rules."
— Senior Trial Attorney
Common questions
Discover Social Clues with Confidence
Ethical and compliant — we never send friend requests or direct messages.